Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 19, 2000No. 991500CIVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

GOLD, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 9]. The defendant seeks to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, contending that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In essence, the defendant contends that it paid all contractual damages within 60 days of plaintiffs filing of notice, thus satisfying Florida Statute § 624.155(2)(d) and curing the alleged violation. In addition to defendant’s motion to dismiss,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hunnings v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Nadine Brooks v. Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re the Complaint of the Sea Vessel, Inc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability as the Owner of the M/v Sea Lion v v. Juan ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Talat Enterprises, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API