Legal Opinion

Crouse v. Crouse

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1985No. Docket 75243Published

1Opinion of the Court

140 Mich. App. 234 (1985)

363 N.W.2d 461

CROUSE

v.

CROUSE

Docket No. 75243.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided January 14, 1985.

Loomis, Ewert, Ederer, Parsley, Davis & Gotting (by Maurice E. Schoenberger and Michael G. Lofgren), for plaintiff.

Frederick L. Stackable, for defendant.

Before: V.J. BRENNAN, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and C.R. COLEMAN,[*] JJ.

2Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from a denial of his motion to amend a judgment of divorce. We affirm.

The judgment of divorce, dated March 25, 1977, was drafted by plaintiff's attorney. Defendant was not represented by counsel. In pertinent part the judgment provides:

"John…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carnes v. SheldonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Schaeffer v. SchaefferMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Graybiel v. GraybielMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Crouse v. CrouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API