Legal Opinion
Finks v. Hollis
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 18, 1905PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from the County Court of McLennan. Trial below before Hon. G-. B. Gerald.
1Opinion of the Court
KEY, Associate Justice.
This is the second appeal in this case, the former decision being reported in Hollis v. Finks, 34 Texas Civ. App., 12, 8 Texas Ct. Rep., 680. At the last trial verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff, and the defendants have appealed.
The verdict of the jury is assailed by the first assignment of error, the contention being that no sufficient proof of misrepresentations was made. As we reverse the case upon another ground we do not rule on this assignment.
Under the second assignment of error, it is contended that the plaintiff was not entitled to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Ry. Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Williams v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by12 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Wheeler v. HollowayTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Price v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Taylor Cotton Oil Co. v. Early-Foster Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Crawford v. El Paso Land Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.