Legal Opinion

Palmer v. McFarlane

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1907No. 14,773PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Saline county: Leslie G. Hurd, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C.

As a defense to an action by the indorsee against one of the makers of a promissory note, the defendant charged, in effect, that the note was given for a horse sold and delivered by the payee to the defendant’s comaker, that the horse had been stolen, was not the property of the payee, and after the execution and delivery of the note had been claimed and taken from the possession of the purchaser by the real owner, and consequently that the note Avas without consideration and illegal in its inception. The reply is a general denial. A trial to the court resulted in a general finding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Schmelling v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. YocumWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Gasper v. Security State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Intermountain Agricultural Credit Ass'n v. Payette CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API