Legal Opinion · Dissent

Remeneski v. Klinakis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1996No. A96A0107Published

1DissentBeasley, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent because the trial court was correct in denying summary judgment to defendant Remeneski on the fighting words charge. This was the only charge prosecuted by Remeneski, and it suffered a directed verdict because the evidence could not support a verdict. It was the solicitor who added a simple assault charge, which the jury rejected.

Remeneski contended that the fighting words charge was closely related to the simple assault charge so that the denial of a directed verdict on the simple assault charge in the preceding criminal trial constituted a binding determination of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Monroe v. SiglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. Day Realty Associates, Inc. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  4. State v. KlinakisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Perry v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API