Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Providence Water Supply Board

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 28, 1983No. 81-331-M.PPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELLEHER, Justice.

This is a statutory petition for certiorari which has been filed pursuant to the terms of G.L.1956 (1977 Reenactment) § 39-5-1. The Attorney General, in filing the petition, seeks to overturn a refusal by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to consider an alleged misuse of funds by the Providence Water Supply Board (the board) as the PUC authorized an increase in rates charged by the board so that the latter’s annual revenues would be increased by almost $2,400,-000. In order that we may put the only issue in this controversy into its true focus, it is necessary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Narragansett Electric Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. City of Providence Ex Rel. Water Supply Board v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Providence Water Supply Board v. MalachowskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ParadisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API