Stanley v. Foote
Wyoming Supreme Court
EeeoR to the District Court, Johnson County, Hon. Joseph L. Stotts, Judge. Eobert Foote sued J. M. Stanley and caused an attachment to issue. Certain parties were summoned as garnishees in said action, and answered, showing that they were indebted to the defendant. J. S. Stanley filed a petition of intervention, claiming that the indebtedness was to him instead of the defendant. The matter was tried, and judgment was rendered against the intervenor. He prosecuted error.
Read the full summary
EeeoR to the District Court, Johnson County, Hon. Joseph L. Stotts, Judge. Eobert Foote sued J. M. Stanley and caused an attachment to issue. Certain parties were summoned as garnishees in said action, and answered, showing that they were indebted to the defendant. J. S. Stanley filed a petition of intervention, claiming that the indebtedness was to him instead of the defendant. The matter was tried, and judgment was rendered against the intervenor. He prosecuted error. The other facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Knight, Justice.
On September 9, 1898, defendant in error, Eobert Foote, commenced an action against defendant in error, J. M. Stanley, upon a promissory note, and secured a writ of attachment and order of garnishment upon the ground that “said defendant is about to convert his *336property, or a part thereof, into money, for the purpose of placing it beyond the reach of his creditors. ’ ’
On September 19, 1898, J. M. Stanley, as defendant in the aforesaid .action, filed his answer; first, admitting execution and delivery of note sued ; second, denying payment as indorsed thereon ; third, pleading…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Risher v. GilpinIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neiderjohn v. ThompsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Stacey-Vorwerk Co. v. BuckWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- Steffy v. Teton Truck Line Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1932