Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1928No. 11599PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment upon forfeiture of a bail bond.

Appellants, who were sureties, denied under oath the execution of the appearance borid by the principal. It is undisputed that the name of the principal, Tom Walker, was signed by F. M. Scott, in the manner following: “Tom Walker, by Attorney F. M. Scott.”

Art. 269, C. C. P., provides:

“A ‘bail bond’ is an undertaking entered into by the defendant and his sureties for the appearance of the principal therein before some court or magistrate to answer a criminal accusation; it is written out and signed by the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Weddel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Zidell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Lockwood and Lyons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API