Legal Opinion
Bathsheba Nichole Adams v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 19, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01823Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Bathsheba Nichole Adams, No. CV-25-01823-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On July 1, 2025, Defendant Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. (“Defendant” or 16 “Kiewit”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), under 17 Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Doc. 12). Plaintiff Bathsheba Nichole Adams (“Plaintiff”) 18 filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. 15), and Defendant thereafter filed a Reply. 19 (Doc. 18). 20 I. Background…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.