Legal Opinion

Haines v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff's intestate died from injuries received while passing along the side of the track of the defendant on Webster street in the city of Tonawanda. He had passed up Sweeney street to its junction with Webster street and then, as the evidence shows, looked up and down the railroad track and, no train being in sight, turned on to Webster street and proceeded for about forty feet along and very near the track of the railroad on Webster street, when he was hit by a train coming behind him, causing the injury of which he died. There was evidence tending to show negligence in the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cutting v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. McNish v. Village of PeekskillNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. J. H. Schneider & Co. v. AmendolaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  4. Troy Automobile Exchange v. . Home Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Chambers v. GoldklangAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API