Legal Opinion

James Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 31, 2013No. 09-56675PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff — Appellant James “Jim” Brown alleges that Defendant — Appellee Electronic Arts, Inc. (“EA”) has violated § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), through the use of Brown’s likeness in EA’s Madden NFL series of football video games. In relevant part, § 43(a) provides for a civil cause of action against:

[a]ny person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Ginger Rogers v. Alberto Grimaldi, Mgm/ua Entertainment Co., and Pea Produzioni Europee Associate, S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Kristensen v. Credit Payment ServicesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  2. Samuel Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. John Karczewski v. Dch Mission Valley LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Christopher Gordon v. Drape Creative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Victoria v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API