Legal Opinion

Kondrat v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1992No. 463 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the referee’s denial of the dependents’ claim of Gloria Kondrat. We vacate and remand.

Mrs. Kondrat filed a fatal claim petition for dependents’ benefits following the death of her husband, Albert Kond rat. 1 The referee found the following relevant facts giving rise to that claim. Albert Kondrat was employed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation as an expediter in the purchasing department of the Nuclear Operations Division. He and his wife attended an employer-sponsored dinner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Andracki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Gallick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Flanagan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anzaldo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Benson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. L. Sarmiento-Hernandez v. WCAB (Ace American Insurance Company)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Creaturo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API