Legal Opinion

Ex parte Pritchett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Original petition in the Supreme Court. Petition by Tommy Pritchett for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the decision of said court in the case of Pritchett v. Fife, 8 Ala.

Read the full summary

Original petition in the Supreme Court. Petition by Tommy Pritchett for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the decision of said court in the case of Pritchett v. Fife, 8 Ala. App. 462 ; 62 South. 1001. The plea of infancy is required to be pleaded specially, it being a personal privilege.—Cooper v. Payne, 94 Ala. 223; Riley v. DU-, Ion, 148 Ala. 283. The plea was sufficient and the court erred in sustaining the demurrers.—Daniels v. Hamilton, 52 Ala. 105. The plea of infancy was also good because if the injury complained of arises from a breach of the contract, although…

1Opinion of the CourtMayfield, J.

This petition is for a certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the cause of Tommie Pritchett v. U. G. Fife, 8 Ala. App. 462, 62 South. 1001, on appeal from the circuit court of Pickens county. Every ruling of the trial court and of the Court of Appeals adverse to the defendant in the trial court (appel*386lant in the Court of Appeals, and petitioner here) is assigned and insisted upon as error. The action in the-trial court was detinue for two mules and a set of harness. The trial resulted in verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pritchett v. FifeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Drennen Motor Car Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API