Legal Opinion

Miskin v. City of Fort Lauderdale

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 1995No. 94-3618PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

661 So.2d 415 (1995)

Martin C. MISKIN, Appellant,

v.

The CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 94-3618.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 18, 1995.

James P. Durkin, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Dennis E. Lyles, City Attorney, and Lindsey A. Payne and Paula C. Tighe, Assistant City Attorneys, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

GUNTHER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Martin C. Miskin, plaintiff below (Miskin), appeals a final summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee, the City of Fort Lauderdale (the City). We affirm.

On September 19, 1991,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milton v. MiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Point East One Condominium v. POINT EAST, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Daniels v. KatzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Demura v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cannon v. CannonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
  2. Town of Lake Park v. GrimesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Mathieu v. City of Lauderdale LakesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Robles v. RoblesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Fong v. Town of Bay Harbor IslandsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API