Legal Opinion

Lohnes v. Brooks

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 26, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00097Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION JAMES ANDREW LOHNES, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 2:19-CV-97-TLS-JPK OFFICER BROOKS, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER James Andrew Lohnes, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. ECF No. 109. Lohnes asserts that the Defendants’ attorneys, in the response to his motion for leave to amend his complaint [ECF No. 106], “willfully and maliciously misrepresented the facts and lied to the court.” ECF No. 109. In his motion to amend his complaint, Lohnes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leif Hinterberger v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Hartmarx Corporation v. A. Robert Abboud, Spencer Hays, Tom James CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Harjit Singh v. Arthur J. Curry, Christine Curry, Sukhjit Gill, Barry H. Greenburg, and Nathan's Deli, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API