Legal Opinion

People v. Burdette

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1933No. Docket No. 2289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendants were convicted of the crime of violating section 146 of the California Vehicle Act, to wit, driving an automobile without the consent of its owner so to do, etc. Prom the ensuing judgment, as well as from the order by which the motion for a new trial was denied, defendants have appealed to this court. In addition thereto, defendant Lemons has appealed “from an order denying said defendant probation”.

The only specific point presented as a reason for the reversal of the judgment is “that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the evidence”. It appears to be conceded by appellants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. YeomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BurdetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API