Legal Opinion
Turner v. Kuehnle
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided August 10, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs. For the opinion of this court on demurrer to the bill herein, see '68 Atl. Rep. 827.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, Y. C.
As the facts developed on the final hearing herein vary somewhat from those set out in the bill and dealt with on the demurrer," it seems advisable to restate them.
On the 31st 'day of August, 1893, and- before that day, the complainant, Mrs. Turner, was living in a dwelling-house in the city of Atlantic City which constituted the home of herself, her husband and their children. In point of fact, however, the husband and wife at that time or shortly afterwards were not on good terms with each other and did not cohabit as man and wife, the husband having apparently a home…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State, Com'r of Transportation v. ShumanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Fire Guard Sprinkler Corp. v. ManolioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Pingree v. DehavenSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Towbin v. PierroNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925