Legal Opinion

RPM, Inc. v. Pentagon Chemical & Paint Works, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated June 13, 1985, which denied their motion for a protective order and ordered their expert to appear for a deposition.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Because the material examined by defendants’ expert is no longer available for inspection by plaintiffs, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in ordering that the expert be deposed (see, CPLR 3101 [d]; compare, Fedorcyzk v New York Univ., 95 AD2d 822, with Cepin v Cepin, 66 AD2d 764).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cepin v. CepinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Fedorcyzk v. New York UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosario v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Prasad v. B.K. Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Kaufman v. Lund Fire Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API