Legal Opinion

Evans v. Hoyme

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1960No. File 9815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRentto, J.

This proceeding was brought to enjoin the defendant, Ellis Hoyme, a reflexologist residing in Big Stone City, from holding himself out as qualified to engage in the diagnosis and treatment of human ills and from engaging in or offering to engage in their treatment. The trial court granted the injunction and he appeals from the judgment.

Hoyme had lived in Big'Stone City about two and a half years before the trial of this matter. During that time he had treated some 350' to 400 people administering close to 10,000 treatments in all. Briefly stated, the practice of reflexology as disclosed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SteinbergNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1947
  2. State v. WheatonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. People v. ZinkeNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1938
  4. People v. ReuterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nelson v. PalmquistSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. McKay Construction Co. v. Ada County Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Evans v. UnruhSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Johnson v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API