Union Ferry Co. v. Fairchild
New York Supreme Court
Demurrer to separate defenses and counterclaims set up in the answer.
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
Novel questions are presented by this demurrer to the separate defenses and counterclaims set up in the answer. It appears from the allegations of the complaint that the plaintiff, a corporation, operates a ferry under a public franchise between the boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn. The defendant (now represented in the action by the receivers substituted since its. commencement) owns property adjoining that of the plaintiff at the foot of Hamilton avenue, the Brooklyn terminal of the ferry.
For many years prior to 1890 the ferry was operated by another corporation, the Union Ferry Company…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Smith v. . ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Baxter v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Burbank v. . FayNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of GoldburgNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933