Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Respess

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 20, 1970No. 22,201Published

1DissentFeRguson, Judge

I dissent.

If two different accused rob the same store on the same day but at different times and there is no evidence that they acted in concert, can it reasonably be contended that they could lawfully be charged in the same indictment and tried together? Cf. Rules 8 and 13, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.1 See United States v Davis, 14 USCMA 607, 34 CMR 387 (1964). How, then, can it be held, as in this case, that the law officer did not err when he denied a defense request to grant a separate trial for this accused? Respess and Hilburn were tried in common, on order of the convening…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. CharnayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. United States v. AlvarezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. BodenheimerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API