Legal Opinion
James Edward Davis v. Secretary of the Army, No. 30946 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1971No. 817PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
440 F.2d 817
James Edward DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY et al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 30946 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, et al., 5th Cir. 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 29, 1971.
James Edward, Davis, pro se.
John W. Stokes, Jr., U.S. Atty., Richard H. Still, Jr., Allen I. Hirsch, Asst. U.S. Attys., Atlanta, Ga., for respondents-appellees.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
2Per curiam
1
This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Juan Rigores Sardino v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- William Jameson & Co. v. MorgenthauSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Shelton v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- James C. Tuggle v. Harold Brown, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Hodges v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Hodges v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Nolen v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Lenard Wallace Nolen v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense, No. 73-3782 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974