City of Redondo Beach v. Cate
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the city treasurer to sign certain improvement bonds and coupons. A peremptory writ was awarded upon the facts alleged in the petition, the defendant having declined to answer after his general demurrer was overruled.
It appears that in January, 1900, Redondo Beach was a city of the sixth class; that its board of trustees, proceeding under the act of March 19, 1889, authorizing the incurring of indebtedness by municipal corporations (Stats. 1889, p. 399), passed an ordinance declaring that the public interests and necessity of the people of that city…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rice v. Bd. of Trs. of HaywardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Harden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- City of San Diego v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Peckham v. City of WatsonvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.