Humane Society of the United States v. Pritzker
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I.INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are motions for summary judgment by the parties: Plaintiff Humane Society of the United States’ (“HSUS”), Plaintiff WildEarth Guardians’ (‘WildEarth”) and Defendants Penny Pritzker, National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), and Eric C. Schwaab 1 . Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments, the relevant case law, and the entire record, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment and denies Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
II.PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The instant case was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Stuttering Found. of America v. SpringerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gen Land Off of the St of TX v. U.S. Fish and WildCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Buffalo Field Campaign v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Friends of Animals v. AsheDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Alvarez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Hsieh v. FCA US, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020