Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Bruce Siegel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 16, 2007No. 05-4537PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
A grand jury returned a four-count indictment charging Michael Siegel, with transmission of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (a)(1), and (b)(1) (Count 1); attempted transmission of child pornography by computer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (a)(1) and (b)(1) (Count 2); transmission of obscenity by computer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462 (Count 3) and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (a)(5)(B) and (b)(2) (Count 4).
Siegel pleaded guilty to Count 1 of the indictment. The government, in turn,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Defabian C. ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Khaimraj Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Elanith Valansi v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- United States v. IglesiasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. GiggeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RosaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.