Davis & Boatright v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Associate Justice.
In this case the defendant railway company filed a general demurrer, special exceptions and general denial to plaintiff’s petition, and followed these with a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, in that the penalty claimed by plaintiffs of $200 for failing io feed and water the cattle shipped, as provided for in Revised Statutes, article 284, had been waived by the written contract of plaintiffs, agreeing to take charge of the cattle during transportation and feed and water them themselves, and that all the other damages claimed being only $156, this claim of $200…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blum v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Hoffman v. Cleburne Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Graham v. McCarty & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Howard v. J. H. Britton & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
- Gulf Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WilmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Levy v. LuptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Parks v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930