Fleming v. Canterbury

(after stating the facts as above). As we think the judgment was warranted by the findings set out in the ¡rtatement above, and that those findings were warranted by testimony the jury had a right to consider, we have not thought it necessary to set out other findings made by the jury ánd inquire whether they, too, were supported by competent testimony and warranted the judgment. Nor have we thought it necessary to determine whether the effect of the agreement ’which the jury found Henderson and Crawford entered into, and the acts of Henderson on the faith thereof, were to pass to Henderson…