Belmont Industries, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent to enter its order quashing service of summons for lack of jurisdiction over petitioner.
Viewing the affidavits in a light most favorable to real party in interest (hereinafter “Viking”) 1 the following is established:
Petitioner is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal offices at Philadelphia, and is engaged in the fabrication and erection of structural steel framework for construction projects on the East Coast of the United States. It is not authorized to do business in California; it has never had an office or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Erl Anger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Thos. P. Gonzalez Corporation v. Consejo Nacional De Produccion De Costa Rica, and Sergio Quiros MarotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Sibley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Viam Corporation and Vehicle Power Accessories v. Iowa Export-Import Trading Co., and Spal S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.