Legal Opinion

Hinderhofer v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 20, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Commercial Union Insurance Companies is obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Christopher Calderone in an underlying action entitled Hinderhofer v Daisy Manufacturing Company, Inc., pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under Index No. 95-2636, the defendants Christopher Calderone, James Waltel, and Farm Family Insurance appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated July 24, 2000, as granted the cross motion of the defendant Commercial Union Insurance Companies for summary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sebring v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Gorra v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Gugleotti v. Lincoln Security Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Hydell v. North Atlantic Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API