Legal Opinion

Stark v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1919No. 1267PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Injunction. Before Judge Tarver. Whitfield superior court. November 2, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. The controlling question in this case is, where a man has debauched a minor girl and induced her to abandon her parental abode and live with him in a state of adultery and fornication, and persists in' a continuance of such conduct, will equity afford the father of the girl a remedy by injunction, and to that end enjoin the man from associating with the girl and from communcating with her in any way, either by writing, telephoning, telegraphing, or through the aid and agency of any other person? The following excerpts from the Civil Code have the force and effect of statutes:

§ 5490.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  2. Ex Parte WarfieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Bennett v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Lyon v. LyonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Barnes v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Orloff v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Henley v. RockettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Sutton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Hawks v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API