Legal Opinion

Burkle v. Superflow Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 2, 1951Published

1Opinion of the Court

137 Conn. 488 (1950)

ROBERT N. BURKLE ET AL.

v.

SUPERFLOW MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Argued June 7, 1950.

Decided November 28, 1950.

Reargued January 9, 1951.

Opinion amended February 2, 1951.

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and COMLEY, JS.

Alfonse C. Fasano and John Maresca, for the appellant-appellee (named defendant).

Arthur W. Chambers, Jr., and Gordon P. Chambers, with whom, on the brief, were Thomas A. Grimes and Martin M. Merriam, for the appellants-appellees (plaintiffs.)

COMLEY, J.

The finding, which is not subject to any material correction,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Paisley v. LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing MacHine Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Cohen v. Bartgis Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Blake v. . VoigtNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API