Legal Opinion

Folsom v. Rountree Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1954No. 35001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

The approval by counsel for the defendant in error, of the averments of fact in a bill of exceptions, in compliance with the provisions of Code (Ann. Supp.) § 6-908.1, does not constitute a waiver or acknowledgment of timely service of the bill of exceptions, as required by Code §§ 6-911 and 6-912. Newton v. Bailey, 208 Ga. 415 (67 S. E. 2d 239); Branham v. Branham, 209 Ga. 373 (72 S. E. 2d 713). As it does not appear that the bill of exceptions in this case has been served, or that service thereof has been waived or acknowledged, this court does not have jurisdiction to pass upon the writ of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Branham v. BranhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Newton v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Mahon v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Miller v. Riegel Textile Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cape v. American Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Kinney v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API