Legal Opinion

Meador v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1929No. 12138PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for forgery; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

M. E. Shelly had money in a bank. She could neither read nor write, and J. B. was authorized to sign checks upon said bank in M. E.’s name. It was the State’s theory in this case that appellant induced M. E. to have J. B. sign for her certain papers purporting to pertain to the getting of insurance, one of which papers was in reality a check upon said bank, the amount, payee, etc., in which were then blank, but which check, after being so signed, was later filled in by appellant by writing his own name as payee…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  2. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Blackwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Franks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Slater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Salinas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1981
  5. Zani v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API