Jackson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Cleora Jackson appeals the district court’s order granting the government’s motion for summary judgment and denying her cross-motion for partial summary judgment, contending that the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) failed to comply with the Indian Law Enforcement Reform Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. In her complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), Jackson alleged that, because she was unlawfully arrested by a federal officer, she was entitled to damages for false arrest, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”), and abuse of process. Because these claims…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- LaMantia v. RedisiNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Olivero v. LoweNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Jack E. Turner v. E. T. Raynes and Bill Edd JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Marschall v. City of CarsonNevada Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Manansingh v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024