Legal Opinion

Jackson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 27, 2002No. 01-15494; D.C. No. CV-99-00071-HDMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Cleora Jackson appeals the district court’s order granting the government’s motion for summary judgment and denying her cross-motion for partial summary judgment, contending that the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) failed to comply with the Indian Law Enforcement Reform Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. In her complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), Jackson alleged that, because she was unlawfully arrested by a federal officer, she was entitled to damages for false arrest, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”), and abuse of process. Because these claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. LaMantia v. RedisiNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Olivero v. LoweNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jack E. Turner v. E. T. Raynes and Bill Edd JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Marschall v. City of CarsonNevada Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manansingh v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API