Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 26, 1976No. 1609-2PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, C.J.

Defendant, Michael D. Williams, was convicted by a jury on two counts of first-degree assault. He assigns error to the trial court’s failure to grant his motion to dismiss pursuant to CrR 3.3(f) because he was not brought to trial within the time limits prescribed by the rule. We agree with this contention and reverse the conviction.

The pertinent facts are as follows. On April 12, 1974, the day after the assault, the defendant was arrested and brought before a district court judge for a preliminary appearance. Counsel was appointed for him, bail was set, and he was bound over to superior…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. CuzickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Dean WILLIAMS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. PomeroyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. State v. ColbertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. State v. DeLongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API