Legal Opinion

Harris v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL FUEL AND PETROLEUM COMPANY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1954No. Civ. 12425PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

This is an action for damages based on negligence. The motion for a more definite statement is directed to a complaint in which the cause of action arose in the Republic and/or Country of Italy.

The measure of damages as well as the right to recover must be governed by the lexi loci delictus or the law in the Province and/or Country of Italy. Liechti v. Roche, 5 Cir., 198 F.2d 174; Jansson v. Swedish American Line, 1 Cir., 185 F.2d 212, 30 A.L.R.2d 1385.

It is contended the complaint does not allege the cause of action of the plaintiff with sufficient definiteness and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jansson v. Swedish American LineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
  2. Liechti v. RocheCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dubitzky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  2. Intercontinental Trading Co., Inc. v. M/V ZENIT SUNDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API