Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2023 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

A workmen’s compensation claimant has appealed from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board upholding a referee’s grant of his employer’s petition for modification of a notice of compensation payable. The referee ordered that the claimant, who was receiving compensation for total disability, be paid the compensation for the specific loss of one eye provided by Section 306(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of December 5, 1974, P.L. 782, as amended, 77 P.S. §513, and that the employer should have credit for the temporary total disability…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Killian v. Heintz Div. Kelsey HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Yanik v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Carnovale v. Supreme Clothes, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Hayden v. Stony Spring Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allegheny Power Service Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Grube v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Jessop Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Mosier v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API