Legal Opinion

United States v. Larry Nash Mangiameli, A/K/A Dorian Gray

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1982No. 80-1556PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

18 U.S.C. § 2314 (1976) provides that it is an offense against the laws of the United States for anyone, having devised a scheme or artifice to defraud another of $5,000 or more, to induce that person to travel in interstate commerce in execution or concealment of the scheme. 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1976) provides that anyone who “aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures” the commission of such an offense is punishable as a principal.

Appellant Larry Mangiameli was convicted in a jury trial in federal district court on a single count alleging violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Clifton Gene GibbonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Robert Scott JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Anthony E. Lucero, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Eileen LoweCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Jerry F. BrinklowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. K-B Trucking Company and Keith Collins, Cross-Appellants v. Riss International Corporation and World Leasing, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. People v. DunlapSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. United States v. GuardiaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API