Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2019No. 74076Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, STIGLICH, J.:

*1074The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a defendant in a criminal prosecution the right to confront the witnesses against him or her. A defendant, however, may forfeit that right if he or she procures the witness's absence by wrongdoing. Appellant Arnold Anderson asserted his right to confrontation when the State sought to admit his daughter's out-of-court statements to an investigator employed by the Clark County District Attorney's Office. Relying on the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing exception to the Confrontation Clause, the trial court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API