Pulvari v. Greyhound Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMESON, District Judge.
The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $141,600. By order and memorandum opinion entered June 14, 1968, defendant’s motion for new trial was denied on condition that plaintiff consent to a reduction of the judgment to $85,000. Plaintiff’s consent to the reduction was filed June 18, 1968. Defendant now seeks a credit of $42,500 as the contribution of the joint tortfeasor.
A brief review of the facts is necessary to an understanding of the contentions of the respective parties. Plaintiff sustained personal injuries on February…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKenna v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Joseph Martello v. Thelma HawleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Swigert v. WelkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Brooks v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Zaccari v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rose v. HakimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
- Robert L. Turcotte, Administrator of the Estate of Gerard P. Turcotte v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Robert L. Turcotte, Administrator of the Estate of Gerard P. Turcotte v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974