Legal Opinion

Pulvari v. Greyhound Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 24, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 118-64PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMESON, District Judge.

The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $141,600. By order and memorandum opinion entered June 14, 1968, defendant’s motion for new trial was denied on condition that plaintiff consent to a reduction of the judgment to $85,000. Plaintiff’s consent to the reduction was filed June 18, 1968. Defendant now seeks a credit of $42,500 as the contribution of the joint tortfeasor.

A brief review of the facts is necessary to an understanding of the contentions of the respective parties. Plaintiff sustained personal injuries on February…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKenna v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Joseph Martello v. Thelma HawleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. Swigert v. WelkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Brooks v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Zaccari v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rose v. HakimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
  2. Robert L. Turcotte, Administrator of the Estate of Gerard P. Turcotte v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  3. Robert L. Turcotte, Administrator of the Estate of Gerard P. Turcotte v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API