Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Food Lion, Inc. v. Washington County Beer Board

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1985Published

1ConcurrenceDrowota, Justice

In Henry v. Blount County Beer Board, 617 S.W.2d 888, 889 (Tenn.1981) this Court stated:

Once there has been discrimination in the enforcement of the beer permit distance ordinance, its validity can be restored only “by revocation or other elimination, such as attrition, of the discriminatorily-issued permits and licenses.” City of Murfreesboro v. Davis, 569 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tenn.1978).

At the time of entry of judgment in this case, [Henry] all discriminatorily-is-sued beer permits had been revoked and, consequently, the 2,000 foot rule was valid and in force in Blount County.

In the case at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Murfreesboro v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Needham v. Beer Board of Blount CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Henry v. Blount County Beer BoardTennessee Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API