Holt v. Bowie
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION and JUDGMENT
DALTON, District Judge.
Defendants again move to dismiss the case by summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., their first motion for summary judgment having been denied. Holt v. Bowie, 333 F.Supp. 843 (W.D.Va.1971). Because the facts of this case have been dealt with at length in the defendants’ first motion for summary judgment, they will not be set out in this opinion.
After this court’s decision in the former case, new depositions were taken by defendants’ counsel. In their present motion defendants allege that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sykes v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Anderson v. Thorington Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Floyd v. MitchellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Williams v. E. T. Gresham Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- Vandergrift v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1979
- Barber v. Loews Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1972
- Snead v. Nello L. Teer Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1973
- Baker v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products, Inc.Winchester County Circuit Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.