Legal Opinion

Steege v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. (In re Calumet Photographic, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 9, 2019No. Bankruptcy Case No. 14-08893; Adversary Case No. 16-00195Published

1Opinion of the Court

LaShonda A. Hunt, United States Bankruptcy Judge

At issue before the court is the purely legal question of whether the law of this Circuit still holds that only unpaid new value can be used by a creditor to reduce preference liability under 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(4)(B). After reviewing the parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment and the applicable case law, the court concludes the answer to that question is yes.

Background

The parties agree on the salient facts.1 Debtor Calumet Photographic, Inc. ("debtor"), filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy relief on March 12, 2014, and plaintiff Catherine…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Edward and Pamela Reiser, and Janet Greenlee v. Residential Funding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. In re PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. P.A. Bergner & Co. v. Bank One, Milwaukee, N.A. (In re P.A. Bergner & Co.)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Pettigrew v. Trust Co. Bank (In Re Bishop)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  5. Kaye v. Blue Bell Creameries, Inc. (In Re BFW Liquidation, LLC)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API