Legal Opinion

Hover v. National Grange Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1964Published

1Per curiam

The agreement sued upon is too indefinite for enforcement insofar as it constitutes a promise by defendant to settle plaintiff’s claim (Welden v. Frankfort Gen. Ins. Co., 230 N. Y. 546; Wood v. AEtna Life Ins. Co., 224 App. Div. 628; Habgood v. Van Dyke Taxi & Transfer, 128 Misc. 884, affd. 220 App. Div. 801; Harbot v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 44 F. Supp. 319). Insofar as it provides that defendant pay plaintiff’s remaining medical expenses, if any, sufficient certainty exists (Wood v. AEtna Life Ins. Co., supra). Accordingly, a new trial should be ordered on that issue, with costs to abide…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Habgood v. Van Dyke Taxi & Transfer, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wood v. Ætna Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Habgood v. Van Dyke Taxi & Transfer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Harbot v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942
  5. Welden v. . Frankfort General Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API