Legal Opinion

Harris v. Harris

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1955No. 41764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Seeking in this action a judgment of divorce the plaintiff, Beverly Fields Harris, alleged as grounds therefor that her husband “Felix Harris, has committed adultery with various women at various times and in particularly, petitioner shows, that the said Felix Harris is now living in open adultery and concubinage in Darrowville [should be Darrow], Parish of Ascension, with a woman by the name of Fannie Mae Valentine.” (Brackets ours.)

The defendant filed exceptions to the jurisdiction and of no right and no cause of action. On these being overruled he answered, generally…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  2. Coston v. CostonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Savin v. SavinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. Mack v. HandySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  5. McCartan v. FilkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hermes v. HermesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Bosch v. GirradotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Veazey v. NassarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Havens v. HavensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API