Singleton v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Contrary to the appellant’s sole point on appeal, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s directly responding to the jury’s simple request for the elements of the charged crime of burglary by stating those elements, along with the presumption of innocence and the state’s burden of proof, without also re-reading a previously given instruction concerning the defense of good faith mistake.1 See Engle v. State, 438 So.2d 803 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1074, 104 S.Ct. 1430, 79 L.Ed.2d 753 (1984); Henry v. State, 359 So.2d 864 (Fla. 1978); Freeman v. State, 494 So.2d 270 (Fla.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Engle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Bristow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988