Benn v. Benn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“On a motion to dismiss a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) on the ground that it is barred by the statute of limitations, a defendant bears the initial burden of establishing, prima facie, that the time in which to sue has expired. In considering the motion, a court must take the allegations in the complaint as true and resolve all inferences in favor of the plaintiff’ (Island ADC, Inc. v Baldassano Architectural Group, P.C., 49 AD3d 815, 816 [2008] [citations omitted]). Further, plaintiffs submissions in response to the motion “must be given their most favorable intendment”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arrington v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sitkowski v. PetzingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Maric Piping, Inc. v. MaricAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Island ADC, Inc. v. Baldassano Architectural GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cooper, Bamundo, Hecht & Longworth, LLP v. KuczinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v. TiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- New York City School Construction Authority v. Ennead Architects LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Bokara Rug Co. v. KapoorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Harmit Realties LLC v. 835 Avenue of the Americas, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Lebedev v. BlavatnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.