Legal Opinion

Keerins v. Schiedler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 1, 1995No. 92C-11725; CA A81039PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. The dismissal followed the granting of defendant’s serial motions for partial summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

In his first assignment of error, petitioner contends that the post-conviction court erred in concluding that some of his claims for relief were time-barred. Petitioner concedes that he did not file his petition within the applicable 120-day limitation period. ORS 138.510(2).1 He argues, however, that his delay in filing is excused under ORS 138.510(2)(a), which provides that when a defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Brown v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Fine v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. BELLEQUECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Bean v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Stahlman v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Horath v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API