Legal Opinion
(PC) Clay v. Cates
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 28, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00971Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEANGELO CLAY, No. 1:20-cv-00971-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S 14 CATES, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 18) 16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 ORDER FOR CLERK OF COURT TO 18 ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 Plaintiff DeAngelo Clay (“Plaintiff”) is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint 22 commencing this action…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.