Legal Opinion

Vom Lehn v. Egbert

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.

Action to foreclose mortgage on real property. All defendants have defaulted except Albert Moyer, a subsequent lienor. His answer makes inconsequential denials generally on information and belief. They will have to be disregarded. He pleads usury, however, as a separate defense and as a counterclaim for the amount of his hen. May a defendant, not a party to the bond and mortgage, seek affirmative relief on the ground that plaintiff, mortgagee, exacted from the mortgagor a usurious rate of interest? The cases seem to answer this question in the affirmative. (North River Mortgage Corp. v. 254…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Donlin v. CarlowNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  3. North River Mortgage Corp. v. 254 Sixth Ave. Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API